31 replies to this topic

[blackrott42]

RESPONSE FOR NOLEBULL813:

[blackrott42]

STARTING PLAYERS ONLY FOR BCS TEAMS
FLA: WI (3), TCU (0), STAN (1), VATECH (1), UCONN (2), OK (0), ARK (1), OSU (4), OR (0), AUB (3): TOTAL 15

TEX: WI (2), TCU (19) STAN (3), VATECH (0), UCONN (1), OK (10) ARK (7), OSU (1), OR (2), AUB (1): TOTAL 46

4 STARTING QB'S FROM TX: STANFORD, ARK, OREGON, TCU:
TAKE AWAY TCU AND OKLA AND YOU STILL LOSE. THERE IS NO COMPARISON THAT IS JUST THE STARTERS. THOSE ARGUMENTS ABOUT NO DEFENSE IS BULL. OUR SKILL PLAYERS ARE OUTSTANDING.

Edited by blackrott42, 04 January 2011 - 06:32 AM.

[nolebull813]

im gonna put it in cap lock............... YOU HAVE MOTHER F@#&ING 1200 HIGH SCHOOL TEAMS! IF YOU AVERAGE 40 PLAYERS PER TEAM, 1200 X 40 EQUALS 48,000!!!!

YOU HAVE 48,000 MORE KIDS PLAYING FOOTBALL, BEING BRED AND COACHED TO PLAY FOOTBALL, FROM THE SUPPOSED BEST STATE. SO THOSE 48,000 KIDS HAVE THE TEXAS ADVANTAGE, OF GREAT FACILITIES, COACHING, ETC...

SO IM SURE IF YOU ADDED 48,000 MORE KIDS IN FLORIDA, IT WOULD LEVEL SOME THINGS.

WHAT ABOUT THE COUNTLESS AND COUNTLESS TIMES FLORIDA, FSU AND MIAMI, WERE IN THE BCS. NOW IT JUST FITS YOUR AGRUMENT.

IN COLLEGE ITS NO COMPARISON. THE LAST 40 YEARS. STATE OF TEXAS NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS 1, LOL, FLORIDA-- 10. ONE TO TEN. CHECKMATE

[nolebull813]

MY APOLOGIES, TEXAS HAS 1162 TEAMS NOT 1200 LOL, AND FLORIDA HAS 575 TEAMS.

I USED 40 PLAYERS PER TEAM AS AN AVERAGE BUT ALOT OF TEXAS TEAMS PROBABLY HAVE MORE LIKE 60 OR 80. BUT I'LL USE 40.

1162 X 40 EQUALS 46,480

575 X 40 EQUALS 23,000

DO A LITTLE SUBTRACTION AND YOU HAVE ROUGHLY MORE THAN 23,000 PLAYERS.

THATS STILL AN ENORMOUS AMOUNT.

[blackrott42]

Thats pretty convienent you can twist numbers anyway you like. California has more players but yet we consistently land more Div 1 kids each year. As for your crazy math you do realize in texas there are 304 6man and 1A football teams, from towns that have 100 people. You people from other States harp on numbers but have no idea what the heck you are talking about. If you see where the vast majority or kids are recruited from the schools will be geographically speaking within the same population base of where your recruits come from in North Cuban. Yes we have a lot of high schools half of those schools are small and Private. As for national championships. Texas is the only team to win a NC with starting roster of 99% of kids from the home state. Show me a fl school that has done that.
THAT.

Edited by blackrott42, 05 January 2011 - 06:32 PM.

[blackrott42]

I don't whoop and holla, but I find it comical that people try to somehow justify their football superiority by posting your bowl records LOL. If thats the case California is the best state Stanford, and San Diego State won. LOL. I respect FL and know the HS football is great. Look at the players from TX vs FL from college to NFL. If you put together a starting lineup with each states best from both I will take Texas. Hell in college we would have 11 of the 41 RB's with 1,000 yds
and the best QB's hands down, and that includes the NFL.

[bodyguard]

BCS Recruits By State 2004-08
http://sportsillustr...tate/index.html

[noonereal]

BCS Recruits By State 2004-08
http://sportsillustr...tate/index.html

looks like the more schools the more players and no state has better kids than the next

no surprise that is what I have always said

texans have a hard time admitting this

[nolebull813]

This is just more ammo for the arsenal.

[blackrott42]

This is just more ammo for the arsenal.

Thats 2 yrs old. Not valid ammo. Do you use 2yr old documents for your taxes: Answer NO: Fact texas has more kids on college rosters than any state. Thats BCS and non BCS. Airforce is not a BCS team and beat GA Tech. TCU non BCS thats 70 kids from Texas not counted. LOL, I know they are not BCS quality. They will destroy any team in FLA.

[Tejas05]

They don't get it and some of them never will. 1/3 of Texas high schools are over ran by Hispanics, not exactly your football studs. We've been over this before, but they choose to ignore it. Build a 400 more high schools in Florida and fill them with Cubans and Puerto Ricans and see if your numbers fall.

Secondly, does all Florida high schools play football? What classifications are those with less than 500 students? Another 1/4 of Texas schools have less than 500 kids in them.

Texas 2A less than 430 kids.

Florida 2A over 100 kids.

[nolebull813]

Thats 2 yrs old. Not valid ammo. Do you use 2yr old documents for your taxes: Answer NO: Fact texas has more kids on college rosters than any state. Thats BCS and non BCS. Airforce is not a BCS team and beat GA Tech. TCU non BCS thats 70 kids from Texas not counted. LOL, I know they are not BCS quality. They will destroy any team in FLA.

TCU is an overrated hype machine. an ugly girl with makeup and your drunk and thinks she pretty lol. lets see the meat grinder.....in no order

Tennessee Tech 1-AA
Oregon State---no bowl
Colorado state---3-9, no bowl
Wyoming---3-9, no bowl
UNLV---2-10, no bowl
New Mexico--- no bowl............automatically bowl eligible
SMU---lost to Army in the bowl lol
Baylor---blown out by 6-6 Illinois in bowl lol.
BYU---7-6, beat a lowly UTEP team
San Diego State, no big wins at all, and loss 3 times to MTN west teams, which isnt a great conference
Air Force---9 wins, but barely beat 6-6 G Tech, and loss to all the respectable teams on the schedule
Utah---blown out by TCU, Notre Dame and Boise, basically just the good teams, not special
Wisconsin---barely beat the 1 decent team on the schedule, which plays in a conference that sucks. loss to 11-1 Mich st who loss 49-7 to Bama

so is this the resume of a national power??? answer: hell no. they might beat big teams from sec or big 1 on any given week, but i dont think every single week. not elite

[jbell73986]

im gonna put it in cap lock............... YOU HAVE MOTHER F@#&ING 1200 HIGH SCHOOL TEAMS! IF YOU AVERAGE 40 PLAYERS PER TEAM, 1200 X 40 EQUALS 48,000!!!!

YOU HAVE 48,000 MORE KIDS PLAYING FOOTBALL, BEING BRED AND COACHED TO PLAY FOOTBALL, FROM THE SUPPOSED BEST STATE. SO THOSE 48,000 KIDS HAVE THE TEXAS ADVANTAGE, OF GREAT FACILITIES, COACHING, ETC...

SO IM SURE IF YOU ADDED 48,000 MORE KIDS IN FLORIDA, IT WOULD LEVEL SOME THINGS.

WHAT ABOUT THE COUNTLESS AND COUNTLESS TIMES FLORIDA, FSU AND MIAMI, WERE IN THE BCS. NOW IT JUST FITS YOUR AGRUMENT.

IN COLLEGE ITS NO COMPARISON. THE LAST 40 YEARS. STATE OF TEXAS NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS 1, LOL, FLORIDA-- 10. ONE TO TEN. CHECKMATE

Population is a very weak argument. It would make sense if there was an unlimited amount of scholarships to offer but there aren't. There comes a point where there aren't any college scholarships to offer, so we could have 100K kids play and it would not generate a significant increase in "schollies" offered. This is what is referred to as diminishing returns.

[nolebull813]

Where the first-rounders are
Here's a breakdown of where this decade's NFL first-round picks went to high school:
The Top 10
1. Florida: 47
2. California: 34
3. Texas: 30
4. Georgia: 17
5. New Jersey: 15
6. South Carolina: 15
7. Ohio: 14
8. Louisiana: 13
9. Virginia: 12
10t. Alabama: 9
10t.North Carolina: 9


wow, this is including a year where Florida had no 1st rounders in like 2008. and we still have 17 more than a state with that has more high school football players than some small countrie shave people lol.

[lamarfan]

Throw them a banana

[nolebull813]

Throw them a banana

these non-opinionated facts are just never ending in explaining even with the disadvantage Florida has in sheer mass numbers, wealthy coaches, and high school facilities in Texas that rival some colleges, WE STILL HAVE MORE PLAYERS ON BCS ROSTERS, MORE 1ST ROUND DRAFT PICKS, MORE PRO BOWLERS, ACTUAL SUCCESSFUL COLLEGES WITH LOADS OF NATIONAL TITLES, something like 10 in 27 years, while you have 1 in 40 years!!!

just give us our props, and we'll get back to the babes on the beach, and you can go clean up cow poo. lol.

[nolebull813]

these non-opinionated facts are just never ending in explaining even with the disadvantage Florida has in sheer mass numbers, wealthy coaches, and high school facilities in Texas that rival some colleges, WE STILL HAVE MORE PLAYERS ON BCS ROSTERS, MORE 1ST ROUND DRAFT PICKS, MORE PRO BOWLERS, ACTUAL SUCCESSFUL COLLEGES WITH LOADS OF NATIONAL TITLES, something like 10 in 27 years, while you have 1 in 40 years!!!

just give us our props, and we'll get back to the babes on the beach, and you can go clean up cow poo. lol.

Just kidding, i love you guys. i love coming here and seeing all the crazy posts from the Texans, especially Tejas,and Lamarfan.

keep up the good work gentleman!

[lamarfan]

these non-opinionated facts are just never ending in explaining even with the disadvantage Florida has in sheer mass numbers, wealthy coaches, and high school facilities in Texas that rival some colleges, WE STILL HAVE MORE PLAYERS ON BCS ROSTERS, MORE 1ST ROUND DRAFT PICKS, MORE PRO BOWLERS, ACTUAL SUCCESSFUL COLLEGES WITH LOADS OF NATIONAL TITLES, something like 10 in 27 years, while you have 1 in 40 years!!!

just give us our props, and we'll get back to the babes on the beach, and you can go clean up cow poo. lol.

Spin it how ever you want. Florida doesn't compare with Texas in high school football teams.

[Tejas05]

TCU is an overrated hype machine. an ugly girl with makeup and your drunk and thinks she pretty lol. lets see the meat grinder.....in no order

Tennessee Tech 1-AA
Oregon State---no bowl
Colorado state---3-9, no bowl
Wyoming---3-9, no bowl
UNLV---2-10, no bowl
New Mexico--- no bowl............automatically bowl eligible
SMU---lost to Army in the bowl lol
Baylor---blown out by 6-6 Illinois in bowl lol.
BYU---7-6, beat a lowly UTEP team
San Diego State, no big wins at all, and loss 3 times to MTN west teams, which isnt a great conference
Air Force---9 wins, but barely beat 6-6 G Tech, and loss to all the respectable teams on the schedule
Utah---blown out by TCU, Notre Dame and Boise, basically just the good teams, not special
Wisconsin---barely beat the 1 decent team on the schedule, which plays in a conference that sucks. loss to 11-1 Mich st who loss 49-7 to Bama

so is this the resume of a national power??? answer: hell no. they might beat big teams from sec or big 1 on any given week, but i dont think every single week. not elite

Come on Nole, you don't actually believe that. They would have been the best team in Florida the last 2 years.

I would put lots of money on TCU to beat any of the big 3 schools in FL, and wouldn't 2nd guess it. The only program in Florida that is on the way up is FSU. I like what Fisher is doing there, and the recruits he's getting. Its awfully similar to 15 years ago in Tallahassee.

There are too many questions at Florida and Miami to say either are nearly as good as TCU right now.

[Tejas05]

these non-opinionated facts are just never ending in explaining even with the disadvantage Florida has in sheer mass numbers, wealthy coaches, and high school facilities in Texas that rival some colleges, WE STILL HAVE MORE PLAYERS ON BCS ROSTERS, MORE 1ST ROUND DRAFT PICKS, MORE PRO BOWLERS, ACTUAL SUCCESSFUL COLLEGES WITH LOADS OF NATIONAL TITLES, something like 10 in 27 years, while you have 1 in 40 years!!!

just give us our props, and we'll get back to the babes on the beach, and you can go clean up cow poo. lol.

And in any given year all of that can fluctuate. Two years ago Texas held most of those advantages. Keep up the good work though.